Brievik was not a Christian

Much has been written about the mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik and there is much speculation about him identifying himself as a Christian. Those of us who are practising Christians are absolutely horrified that he could dare claim to be a Christian. Despite what was on a Facebook page that had only been on the Internet for a very short time, Anders Breivik was not a Christian and his own words, in his manifesto tell the real story. A Christian and he does not believe in God? He also has this warped idea that if he had died that he would be seen as a martyr. Well, surprise, surprise, Islamist jihadis think in exactly the same way!!!!!

The only details that have emerged on this alleged Christianity has been a link to the Knights Templar of Norway, which is a sub-branch of the Freemasons. No self-respecting Christian would belong to something like the Freemasons. Yet, if you look a little more closely at this group, something else is clear. The name “Knights Templar” has been stolen from the early Christian Crusaders. There is in fact no link to the original Knights Templar. They ceased to exist, but the Freemsons have used the name for some time.

An even closer look at these Knights Templar in Norway points a finger at them as neo-Nazis, which means that Brievik has been strongly influenced by neo-Nazi thought. 

The real problem seems to be that Brievik, in his mind, saw that it was necessary to create a war. As an extreme nationalist he identified himself as “Christian” but it is an identification that I have seen used by Muslims, who do not distinguish between those who are atheist and agnostic and those who follow Judeo-Christian ideals. It is a similar identification problem. An example of this poor identification is seen in the ramblings of Daffy Duck, or Gadhafi, if you prefer, who talks of the members of NATO as being “the Crusaders”. It is, of course, a false identification, yet it is how Brievik has identified himself.

To be a Christian means to be a follower of Christ, and to be a follower of Christ means that one does not make war on other, neither does one set up others for the smear like Brievik did to the Norwegian Muslims, as well as to the Norwegian Christians. At no point has Brievik in fact identified himself as a follower of Christ. In fact he does not even believe in God.

 

 

Political Ideologue or Insane?

This is the question that we must ask when trying to come to terms with the horror of the massacre in Norway, where more than 70 people (figure revised downwards) have lost their lives. This horror began with the bombing of government offices in Oslo. It should be remarked here, that the activity of bombing government offices is one that is advocated by a Swedish neo-Nazi group of which Breivik was a member online. However, it is the purpose of such an act that requires some analysis since it appears that the purpose of the action was to have the rest of the world blame Muslims, as an act of jihad. This is probably because immediately after the blast there was an online message from an unknown group called “The Friends of Global Jihad” claiming responsibility. That message was taken down but it was enough for the political analysts to pontificate about possible reasons for Muslims to behave in that way – except the majority of Muslims in Norway would not go along with such a thing. (I give some credit to these Norwegian Muslims because they were very quick to condemn what had taken place, and some went to the Cathedral in Oslo to pay respects and to pray for the victims. As such they are people of good will, not bad will).

It did not take long for the Left-wing Media, such as the ABC, BBC, CNN, NewYork Slimes, theAge etc. to attempt to slime the “right wing” or conservative people in politics. The point to be made here is that it is not possible to accept what this person had written online with regard to his politics, because he seemed to be attempting to set up a situation that would lead to war. He claimed to be a Christian, yet he did not attend a mainstream Christian church. Instead he has been linked to the Freemasons in Norway (they have acknowledged that he was a member) and specifically he was linked to the Freemason version of the Knights Templar. It has to be stated that the Knights Templar of Norway in no way resemble the earlier Knights Templar of the Christian Crusades. This is a name that has been stolen and there is simply no link between the two. Thus it is difficult to claim that this man is in fact a Christian because his background says otherwise.

Then there are the smears that he set up regarding the English Defence League and a few other organizations in Europe who are indeed against increased Muslim immigration. He claimed to have had contact with them, but they in turn have condemned his actions and want nothing to do with him. The English Defence League, for example are not into creating a war situation. They are the type that will protest with their banners in a march, and then will go have a drink in a pub. They are simply not on the same page as Breivik. The Swedish neo-Nazis on the other hand have not in fact denied their contact with this particular man.

The fact that he bombed offices of the ruling Labour Party, and that he killed the sons and daughters of the Labour Party members is significant. It shows an extreme hatred of “the left” (I doubt that the Norwegian Labour Party is that far left, but would think they are centre-left). At one point he had been a member of the Progress Party but he left them by 2009. This is the party that would be seen as centre-right, but not extreme-right as claimed by the smear merchants of the Lamestream Media. The Progress Party is probably closest to the American Republicans, the Australian Liberal Party and for reference advocates along similar lines to the TEA movement in the USA. Some members of the Progress Party have had ideals that are libertarian. However, the LSM call them extreme-right because they oppose the continued increase of Muslim immigration into Norway. Should they be seen as Islamophobic because they can clearly see the problems associated with the immigration of an alien people who do not integrate into their way of life? My answer is NO. I do not see that as Islamophobic…. but the attitude displayed by Anders Breivik is most definitely Islamophobic.

The lawyer assigned to Breivik thinks that he is insane. If he is found to be insane then he cannot be brought to trial or kept in prison – ooops… how will they solve keeping him out of society? On the face of what has happened, and based upon the statements gleaned, I agree with the lawyer that Breivik is insane, and in the same way that Hitler was insane. How does this fit in with an ideology? Other than pinning him to the Neo-Nazis it is impossible to pin an ideology on this man, and for that reason the smear merchants need to just shut up.

What is more, in this latest report, based upon the interview with Breivik’s lawyer, Breivik hates democracy. This shows that he has the totalitarian bent of the extreme left-wing in politics. It is also the politics of those who are allegedly on the right but are of the extreme right-wing of politics.

This brings me to the issue of the definitions of left and right. For too long we have been taking notice of the left-wing media meme that if one is conservative or “funadamentalist” then they are right wing, and that everyone else is right wing. If you advocate against an immigration policy that allows an alien group who are unwilling to integrate into society, the left wing meme is to scream “Islamophobia”, which is of course, not true. It is just  means of attempting to shut down debate, as well as an attempt to alter our society by people who are in fact totalitarian in nature and hate our countries so much that they are willing to sell us into the slavery that comes with an Islamic invasion. They are people who are extremely ignorant of the true past history, and who have embraced an historical revisionism that clouds the truth. This happens amongst those of the real extreme right wing, as well as amongst those on the extrem left-wing.

The problem is that Christian fundamentalists have obscured the real reason for the Crusades as well as for the Inquisitions of the Middle Ages. The purpose of the Spanish Inquisition which was instituted by Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand of Spain is in a different category. However, when the truth is known about the reasoning behind why it took place, one can at least come to terms with those actions, without having to accept the actions as being appropriate. The fact remains that in those early centuries Islam was a very real threat to European Christendom, but there was a twin threat to the Church because of the activities of heretics. The heretics in question were known as Cathars, and they were not confined to one location. They included the Bogomills of Bosnia (who later converted to Islam) as well as the Albigenses in France (Toulouse). They were present in Italy, Spain and other European countries. The Cathars claimed to be Christians but in fact they were nothing of the sort. They had some very strange practices, including their vegan diet, refused to marry, but some had children out of wedlock, homosexuality was rife amongst them, and they ritual that involved suicide (they actually refused to eat any food after receiving their only sacrament called the consolatum). The Cathars were the anarchists of the Middle Ages, and for some people the Inquisitions actually saved a number of lives because people were falsely accused of being heretics. However, there were also times when say the kings and queens of a region interfered in the process which then led to what we describe as a massacre. It is indeed these massacres that are played up by the Fundamentalist Christians even though the massacres were not instigated by the Church, but by a king or queen.

Not all groups described as fundamentalists are right wing. A good example is that of the Westboro Baptist Church. This small group of people who are extremely obnoxious go around demonstrating at various funerals. The LSM never state the political affiliation of the group. They are Democrats, not Republicans. They are also not involved in the TEA movement. The leader of this band of obnoxious individuals is an associate of Al Gore…. oops, how inconvenient.

Yet, it is the description of right and left, involving Nazi Party and Marxists that is quite amusing. In the 1930s there were several European countries that saw the rise of Fascism, whilst at the same time there was a rise in Communism in Russia. There is very little difference between these two ideologies, because both rely upon the state as the controller. Both are based upon totalitarianism. The Spanish Civil War is an example of how people on each side of these ideologies hated each other. The outcome in Spain was a win for General Franco, however, Franco did not support Hitler, nor did he support Mussolini during the 2nd World War. Franco actually supported the allies during that time…. interesting. The Spanish Civil War however, remains as the best example of how both sides of the Socialist coin hated each other. In that same period Norway had a Nazi government, led by Quisling. It is interesting to note how we will describe a person as a quisling and that saying has its roots in the story of this particular man. The Norwegians, on the other hand joined the Underground Resistance and assisted the Allies.

In other words, at least in Europe there is little distinction between the left and the right wings of politics. This is because the political parties are both on the left of centre, but one form of ideology is more left than the other. There is indeed no real right wing. Also, being anti-immigration does not make anyone extreme right wing, especially when the origins of “left” and “right” are taken into consideration.  The history goes back to the French Revolution, where the group that sat on the right of the Parliament were monarchists wanting to keep the status quo, and the group on the left were very much into a different form of totalitarianism.

In the twentieth century it has been common to place a military junta such as that of Pinochet in Argentina, or Franco in Spain on the right, but again it is not strictly correct because Pinochet was a totalitarian dictator, just like the Marxist Chavez in Venezuela or the Marxist Fidel Castro in Cuba. The other side of the coin has not in fact had power. There is no real capitalism in any of these South American countries. Giving power to the former ruling families in say Nicuragua or Bolivia does not mean that there will be Capitalism, or that there will be real democracy.

The fact is that the LSM has muddied the real meaning of left and right in politics for their own political purposes. Not even in Australia is it logical to use the misnomers of “left” and “right”. This is especially true when the labels of “extreme right” or “extreme left” are applied. It would be better to state the obvious – that within the ALP, the current Prime Minister is a Marxist. At the same time the Green Party try to hide their real affiliations because the party is indeed made up of people who are Marxists, and who have sought to gain power by pretending an interest in the environment.

How then, does any of this fit with the profile that is being built up about the Oslo murderer? Since the man hates democracy he cannot be described as right wing. This hatred does not fit with the right wing in politics. He appears to be a Nazi and as such he should be placed on the left of politics if at all possible because the Nazis being members of a Socialist Party are indeed left-wing but are to the right of the Marxist ideology that they share in common with Communists. However, in reality, if the man has indeed descended into insanity is it even appropriate to apply any political label?

An interesting MS study

More than 20 years ago in Canberra, I had a friend by the name of Thea, who had developed Multiple Sclerosis. Thea’s MS developed to the point that she needed to be in a wheelchair. Thea was the kind who tried to fight the disease, and that included becoming a counsellor for others who found themselves in the same predicament. It is somewhat unusual that amongst Thea’s former schoolmates there were several who had also developed MS. This led her to believe the theory that it was possible that a batch of vaccine for polio could have been the culprit. This theory was never tested or proven.

Now, however, it seems that there is a possible or probable link between MS and glandular fever, in some cases. A recent Australian study has found evidence of EBV in people with MS. The study found:

“We found that the presence of EBV antibodies was directly related to an increased risk of demyelinating disease, and there was also a strong relationship with certain genes of central importance to the immune system,” Associate Professor Robyn Lucas said.

 

“High levels of EBV antibodies indicate a past infection with glandular fever, which in combination with a specific HLA-DR15 or HLA-A genotype increased the risk of a first demyelinating event by 20 times.”

 

The work was carried out as part of the Ausimmune Study.

 

Assoc Prof Lucas said the research was consistent with other studies showing a link between markers of past EBV infection and MS Risk and could lead to new therapeutic and preventative strategies for MS.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/glandular-fever-linked-to-ms-risk-study/story-e6frfku0-1226099951503#ixzz1SohZYDHY

This kind of breakthrough is good news for those who have received the devastating news that they have MS.

Greenpeace Sydney office raided – and so it should. They are eco-terrorists

In the wake of the destruction of the CSIRO experimental wheat crops, the police have raided the Ultimo office of Greenpeace.

The CSIRO has been experimenting to find a crop that will be good for people who have diabetes and who have celiac disease. These were the crops that have been destroyed.

Greenpeace does not have the right to destroy any crops just because of some propaganda that they have been spreading. There is absolutely no evidence to prove their claims that such crops are dangerous to our health. Their claims are based upon one experiment involving mice where the results were indeed open to question.

We have been using genetically modified wheat since William Farrer came up with his wheat that was rust resistant. I see no reason why these experiments should be considered as dangerous. The crops were covered, which means there was not even any chance of cross contamination as these eco-terrorists have claimed.

Also, it must always be kept in mind that his behaviour has been going on in Germany, Switzerland, the UK and other parts of Europe. One must question their motivation because it never is as they claim. Greenpeace are not environmentalists and they do not give a fig about nations where there are currently droughts. The destruction of these crops actually proves that they are working to another agenda and that they have a different ulterior motive.

More Green lies

This week the Greens reached yet another low point in their attempt to manipulate world opinion. This time the issue is not the GREAT CLIMATE LIE, but the lies concerning Genetic Manipulated crops. Here in Canberra the Greens broke into and destroyed wheat crops belonging to the CSIRO. In their manipulative manner, the Greens will have you believe that these crops are so dangerous that they will render you or your grandchildren sterile. The fact is, that this is more than likely utter mushroom fodder, based as it is, upon faulty research concerning mice and maize.

The bogey man in the saga is Monsanto, a large multi-national company. Yes, I have seen the propaganda about Monsanto buying up all the seeds, and how it is claimed the seeds are rendered sterile etc. etc. However, after the destruction this week at Ginninderra experimental farm, I have real doubts about the motivation. This was a coordinated world wide attack. It was not just here in the ACT where crops were destroyed, but it was also in Germany.

First, let me address the matter of the crops destroyed in Germany. The value of the crops destroyed is more than E250,000. These were experimental crops being sponsored by the German government. They destroyed wheat crops that were being grown that would be resistant to fungal diseases. The potato crops were being develped to produce a polymer that could be potentially used to produce plastics – it would be a replacement for the polymer that is now produced from oil (that big bogey man). Do they have proof that these crops would be dangerous to our health? Do they not understand that what crops in the past have been developed to overcome rust? (I will get to that point soon).

Second, the same bunch of stupid Green goons are on the attack in the UK where the scientists are working to produce a potato that is resistant to potato blight. I would have thought that an improved strain of potato that was resistant to blight, and that would eliminate a future potato famine would be a good thing, not bad, like these terrorist lunatics would have us believe.

Third, is the case of the destruction of crops here in Ginninderra, ACT, Australia. These crops are being developed to see a wheat that is gluten free, and that will have a lower GI than the current wheat. If the experiment went well, then it would be a big boost for people with diabetes, as well as those with celiac disease because it would give them a larger food choice than is the case right now. These GREEN thugs committed several crimes – break and enter and vandalism leading to the destruction of property. I have no idea about the value of the crop that they have destroyed.

Fourth, this same kind of destruction also occured to the crops in Switzerland in 2009. There seems to be a trend for this kind of destructive behaviour from these eco-terrorists who seem to think that they have the right to dictate whether or not scientists should be attempting to improve our food crops for the future. It seems as if they are actually not all that interested in the future of sustainable crops.

Here is my point: The thugs are once again attempting to manipulate public opinion by using scare tactics. In this case it is the scare tactic about future sterility.  This future sterility is not proven, rather it is based upon a flawed experiment related to maize in Austria. However, that flawed experiment has been enough to cause yet more alarmism. It is just like the Globull Warming scaremongering. Their claims are not supported by empirical evidence. They have no regard for the fact that over time our crops have been improved by such experiments and that this has ensured the long time viability of the crops.

Here is my question: William James Farrer was an Australian scientist. His claim to fame was the development of a rust-resistant strain of wheat. If he was alive today and working for the CSIRO on a similar wheat project, would his research be trashed by these ignorant Green goons?

It is true, we have used genetically modified food for a very long period of time. The rust-resistant wheat developed by Farrer is an example of what was achieved in that it improved the species of wheat.

 

 

 

Freedom of the Press

I believe in the right of free speech in the press. I also reserve the right to accept or rejects comments upon my own blog. If such comments are rejected it is usually because the troll concerned is a paid hack who writes in terms of moral relativism which is designed to not address the subject in hand, but to go off at other tangents. Also, I have the right to express my own opinions without the sycophants blowing hot air all over my blog with their absurd nonsense in supporting the worst ever Prime Minister in the history of Australia, as well as supporting policies that are extremely harmful for the economic well-being of Australia, and that threaten our very existence as free people.

At the same time I believe that free speech and the freedom of the press comes with some responsibility. The ethics of the modern journalists is at an all time low. This is especially true in the UK where former members of the News of the World organization were responsible for a hacking scandal that is absolutely breath-taking. It must be remembered that the hacking could not have taken place unless other people were co-operating with those concerned. For example, somebody supplied the private phone numbers of Prince Charles and the late Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, thus exposing their private phone conversations. This, in my view was not ethical behaviour. however, that is now in the past and people have already gone to jail in relation to the hacking scandal.

The scandal itself should not be used as a way of launching a witch hunt against the Murdoch Press. Although the chief executives are ultimately responsible for their employees, in a global organization the responsibility stops with the CEO in that particular country. The activities of the employees in one country, should not be used against the more ethical employees in another country. The buck stops with the Editors, not with the CEO. This is because the editors are responsible for the day-to-day publishing of their newspaper.

What would be achieved if such a media review was started? NOTHING. Such a review should be seen as nothing more than a witch hunt.

Conservatives, who are in fact the middle of the road people, have a right to express their opinions. If Bob Brown got his way, the voice of conservatives would be silenced. People have a right to express their non-belief in the scientific scam called man-made global warming. One does not need to be a scientist to be able to see through the crap that has been spouted. The so-called peer-review is as much a scam as the theory itself. It is all based upon sham statistics and computer modelling. On top of that there are just some things that do not add up, that point to global cooling, rather than warming. There is also something called cycles that is totally ignored.

In expressing my pov on this subject, I refer to the summer of 1959 when the temperatures reached the same highs as they did in 2009, and they did the same in 1939. The bushfire in 2009 was not caused by the high temperatures, but they were caused by a fire bug in some instances. The floods in 2010/2011 were also cyclical, but the situation was made worse because the Brisbane Council allowed building to take place in what was known to be flood plains. On top of that the operation of the Wivenhoe dam at the time left a lot to be desired. Going by the book does not mean that common sense is being followed. Either way, the event was not caused by global warming.

Right now we are going through a very cold winter. Just this week I had a conversation with an elderly lady who expressed the fact that she did not remember undergoing such a cold winter. Well, I have, but not in Australia. That was in January-March 1985 when I lived in Ohio, and the temperature reached a low of -28F. The idea that the earth is supposed to be warming to such an alarming degree simply does not sit well when we are experiencing these particular conditions. I guess that a week’s worth of just visible snow makes it hard to accept the alarmism.

I have a right to express the fact that I consider the tax on the air that we breathe to be nothing more than a redistribution of wealth. Yes. I have a right to be heard. It is called free speech.

 

It’s Time to go Juliar Dullard

Australia has the most incompetent government since Federation headed by the red-headed bimbo Juliar-the Marxist-Watermelon – Dullard. This particular government is in fact illegitimate, especially with the ALP minority status. The ALP did not win a majority of the seats, in fact the Coalition had that extra seat but also did not have a majority after the 2010 election.

As a result of this extraordinary situation of a hung Parliament, when Dullard managed to hang on, no matter what the cost, especially to the electorate, Australia has been spiralling downwards into economic decline. Dullard made an agreement with the Devil aka Bob Brown and the Watermelon Party. She has given in to all of the Watermelon demands that are designed to kill the Australian economy.

The electorate is giving the thumbs down to this imposed carbon tax. We do not want it. We are able to see through the global warming/climate change/ or whatever they are calling it this year, scam. Yes, climate does change because it goes in cycles – duh!!  However, what is not proved is the garbage that comes from those computer models, which is in reality not legitimate science at all. The computer models are in fact based upon manipulated data, and some of the data has been retrieved from collection points designed to give a reading that inflates the world temperatures.

The world temperature is not climbing by any statistically significant amount. The air that we breathe out makes no difference to the climate. Man does not influence to frequency and intensity of tornadoes, hurricanes or cyclones. Man does not influence the Richter scale intensity of an earth tremor. Man has no impact upon temperatures in the ocean.

The most often repeated of the mushroom fodder relates to glaciers and icebergs. The scaremongering is itself alarming. A glacier does not disappear when the temperature hits 100F, but it will melt just a little, as it does every spring and summer. I visited a glacier in Canada when we were experiencing more than 90F heat. Yes it is true that in that part of the glacier the ground was a little bit mushy, but you can bet that as winter came on the situation was different. The truth is that the glacier simply did not melt out of existence. That being said, glaciers do in fact have a limited life. It is no big deal, because other glaciers will take their place.  The Arctic and Antarctic ice shelves are not about to disappear. Again, in summer there will be some melting. It is a no brainer.

The weather during and after the Copenhagen wank-fest should have been sufficient to alert people to the fact that the whole man-made climate change scenario is nothing more than a scam. It snowed during the wank-fest and for weeks afterwards Europe had its biggest snowfall in a long time. It was the Al Gore effect.

Likewise here in Australia we are experiencing cold winters, and yet the wankers in Canberra continue with their crazy nonsense which in fact has nothing to do with climate or environment but is one big massive attempt to redistribute wealth.

Let’s go to the polls, and then we can see if the Dullard really has any kind of mandate.

Trade Tools

This has to be the funniest ad that I have ever seen. Trade Tools have done a magnificient job of explaining the economic results of Juliar’s meddling in our affairs. I consider each of their scenarios to be pretty much spot on as far as what is going to happen in Australia thanks to the stupidity of Juliar-the Marxist bitch – Dullard (Gillard) and her cohort of fairies at the bottom of the garden, the Watermelon Party.

Like I have said so many times, these people have absolutely no clue because they have no business sense at all. They have an ideology that is the opposite of free enterprise. I would be happy to call their ideology Fascism or even Nazism, because the truth is that their approach contains the same elements, economic wise as one finds in a country where the leader is best described as a Fascist.

It should be clear that Fascism or Nazism is more than just rounding up people and putting them in gas ovens declaring such acts as the final solution. The former Spanish dictator General Franco was a Fascist. He was backed by both Germany and Italy in the Spanish Civil War. General Franco imposed a socialist state (which is not surprising since Fascism is still socialism and only slightly different to communism) but he did not kill millions of people at the same time, where as Stalin, Lenin, and Hitler were guilty of the same crimes. So what we look at is not the crimes of Hitler, but we look at the government of Mussolini as well as that of Franco, and we look at the economic system that they imposed.

You can call it using a little bit of sunlight on a very dark subject, and that the dark subject is the extreme communism of Bob Brown, Christine Milne, Lee Rhiannon, as well as of Juliar Dullard (the Marxist) and her cohort such as Wayne the Goose Swan.

Why the stupid Green Party aka the Watermelons have it so wrong

It seems to me that education in Australia must be an absolute mess, because there are just so many ill-informed younger people who cannot discern for themselves when they are being punked, especially over climate.

The whole carbon emissions debate is an absolute joke, and even T.V. advertising is getting really weird, like the ad for timber patio furniture that has been seen recently.

Carbon is a wonderful resource. We breathe in oxygen and we breathe out carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide that we breathe out is taken up by plants and trees, and it helps them to grow. The trees and plants in turn pump out oxygen that we breathe in – I believe they used to call that something like the life cycle. It goes around and around, and around.

However, let’s look a little more closely at those trees because the ancient trees are what have formed:

1. Diamonds

2. Coal

3. Oil

4. Gas

Yes, that is correct, diamonds are in fact produced from carbon. Coal is formed from carbon, and yes oil and gas (especially when found together) are formed from carbon. All of it comes from trees, ancient trees that have broken down over time to actually form the carbon deposits – the same carbon deposits that are despised so much by the Watermelons.

What is so amazing is that when you look at carbon dioxide in this way, it is very much a part of the thriving life cycle, not just for us, but also for the plants and the trees, and it actually helps form the forests. What is more amazing is that carbon, hence coal, oil and gas, are in essence a renewable resource. It is a resource that takes millions of years to form, but it is still a renewable resource.

However, I want to look a little more closely at the forests and trees. There are some people, who have absolutely no forestry experience who crap on about retaining old growth forests and how these should never be logged. These people are extremely ignorant because good forestry management requires some logging over time. Without the logging the trees would indeed wither and die, or like what happened in Victoria, and also in the USA (California I think was the locale), there will be spontaneous combustion caused by the failure to clear the undergrowth. That kind of spontaneous combustion is not in fact caused by Climate Change.. but quiet now, do not let the Watermelons know that their ignorance is showing again. Most bushfires are not caused by spontaneous combustion. It is more usual that there is some other cause such as:

1. a spark from a power tool;

2. a cigarette butt flicked out of a car;

3. embers from a fire that has not been properly extinguished;

4. deliberately lit by persons known and unknown.

What we have to realise is that forest fires are also a necessary part of the life cycle. Yes, it is true. Many trees and plants actually need fire so that they can be renewed. At the same time fire is one of the ways of getting rid of pests such as the pine beetle. The other way is for the temperature to reach a certain low in winter, and if that does not happen then the beetle with thrive.

Some of the information that I gathered from a trip to the Rocky Mountains in Canada included information on the larch pine trees, and the other pines that are found everywhere, especially around Banff, Jasper and Lake Louise. When we were there, we saw the devastation to the pine trees that came from an infestation of the pine beetle. The previous winters had not been quite cold enough to freeze the little pest out. We were informed of two things – that the larch pine trees required fire so that they could regenerate. The pine cones that dropped to the forest floor required a high temperature to force them to open and release the seed. This was the other way of getting rid of the pine beetle.

Of course, the result of any forest fire is burned out trees that have produced… tada!! … carbon….

When Margaret Thatcher involved the UK in doing something about “the climate” it was more or less about pollution caused by carbon monoxide that was emitted from car exhausts at the time. This was before the invention of the catalyctic converter. At that time it was common to see the smog hanging over the city. In 1985 when I visited Manhatten Island for the very first time, the smog was so bad that I ended up with a very bad sinus headache. During the 1970s, when I lived in South Windsor NSW, I used to get a headache every time we went near Sydney because of the smog. However, when I visited New York City, on Manhatten Island in 2009 I did not suffer from that headache because the air itself was a lot cleaner. At the same time I lived for 10 years in Sydney and without the same ill effects as in the 1970s. This is evidence that those small steps had indeed made a difference to the air that we were breathing.

Coal-fired power stations belch out smoke, but is it clean or dirty? In other words did the power-station emit anything other than steam? The Watermelons like to pretend that what is emitted is somehow harmful, but is it? Also why do Watermelons hate the very idea of something like the Snowy River Hydro-eletric scheme which is way more efficient than their renewables alternatives?

The point to be made is that the young Australians, and even some of the older Australians who have been clamouring for this crap called a carbon tax are in fact very ill-informed, about carbon, about forests, and yes even about “emissions”. Why are we so concerned about carbon dioxide, when in fact it is carbon monoxide that is the real pollutant? How did we get so far off the track? How on earth did this crap ever gain traction?

 

 

Thanks for nothing Bitch Gillard

Yes, I am feeling very angry, and yes I consider the lying cat a real bitch, who is the most incompetent Prime Minister ever, in Australia.

Families earning more than $65,000 a year will feel the full measure of the incompetent tax that the bitch is intent upon introducing into Australia. These days $65,000 does not make a wager earner wealthy. Families between $65,000 – $300,000 continue to struggle. They have to cope with the increasing cost of having a mortgage as well as increases in doctor fees, utility bills and increases in the cost of fuel.

These are the families that struggle when there are “disabled” people, or those with chronic illness in the family because they are not entitled to get any form of help. It means that they pay the high cost of drugs, physiotherapy, plus high medical fees. It is one of my beefs that the medical reforms introduced by the Whitlam government hurt most families because it meant that government was setting rebates for medical fees, rather than allowing for market adjustments. It also meant an increase in medical fraud on both sides of the coin, which has also hit families very hard. It means that quite often families in this particular category get stuck with very high medical bills, especially when they live in an area where the doctors do not accept medicare on the spot, meaning that the family has to fork over at least $60 per person on the spot, and that is just for the general practitioner. Go to a specialist and the amount of fees is in the hundreds of dollars at a time, especially when going to a skin specialist. Then there is the high cost of the medications. The safety net does not help because that goes up every year, and so does the price of the medication, which often means that once the price on the NHS is equal to the price for the medication, it gets dropped from the list which means it does not count towards the safety net, which means it is more difficult to get to the point of getting some respite from those high costs.

These same families were hit by the Qld flood levy. Oh yes, these middle income earners also get to pay for the incompetence of the Qld Government, through the addition of an extra tax. How kind of that bitch Julia Gillard to slug the middle income earners in this way.

Now we get to the stupidity of the carbon tax, which is something that is unnecessary. The climate scaremongers keep putting out their propaganda and there are so many people who are just too lazy to research all of the facts. They never even bothered to find out about Climategate and the fact that those emails revealed the nature of the scam and fraud being perpetrated upon the world at large. What is worse, by doing a deal with the fairies at the bottom of the garden, that is the Watermelon Party of incompetence and pot smokers, we have a situation where the extremely slimey Bob Brown and that dopey hypocritical Christine Milne get to have a say about what we should be doing. They want the cost of electricity to skyrocket. They want the price of petrol to go up to the point where it is not affordable for even the mid-range family. They expect that if this happens we will, like sheep jump onto a public transport system that is so bad that it does not meet the standard of efficiency. They also have no clue about why roads need to be built, or the needs of the average Australian family . Why should we be forced to freeze because of their scaremongering, and their stupid ideas.

The oceans are not rising. The seaside resorts are not about to be wiped out, and not even by 2100 will the sea-level rise to the point where it will impact upon those luxury homes that are built by the sea. Did I mention that many of those homes are actually owned by the incompetents that go around screaming this green religion? The Great Barrier Reef is not in danger from any warming. It is in fine shape. In fact rather than warming we are going through a cooling phase. So how come so many people are just so stupid that they continue to believe the hype and they chant the mantra “It is for the future”? What utter bullshit!! 

Our responsibility on this earth is for good animal husbandry. We are supposed to be able to sow our own crops, to consume what we need, and to sell or exchange the rest. We are also meant to look after the animals given over to our care, and to use what we require for food. We are supposed to look after the land in other ways. We can do it by making sure that we plant more trees, and that we keep our waterways clear. There are many things that we, as individuals can do to make the planet a better palce to live. However, we cannot impact upon the weather.

As a Christian, I consider that those who promote this idea that somehow imposing a carbon tax is going to affect climate, are just outright arrogant. When I think about it, I am always reminded of the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel. In that story, it was the arrogance of the people in thinking that they could somehow be the equal of God that caused the anger, and then caused the scattering of the people and the changes in language so that they could not understand each other. Well, it is the same right now, because it is outright arrogance to think that we could in any way control nature.

Global Warming or climate change does not cause earthquakes or earth tremors. It did not cause the devastating earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, and in Fukishima in Japan. It did not cause the tsunami that followed the earthquake in Fukushima. It did not cause the recent earth tremors in Victoria, Australia. Global Warming did not cause the Brisbane River to flood, which then caused the district of Brisbane to end up being flooded – that was incompetence due to the timing of the release of water from the Wivenhoe Dam. Global Warming did not cause the deadly twisters in the USA. All of it has been Mother Nature at work. We did nothing to cause those events. We can do nothing to prevent such events in the future.

The carbon tax is nothing more than a Marxist wealth redistribution scheme, and as usual it is the Middle Income earners who are being squeezed. The compensation package that has been announced is nothing more than an attempt to buy the electorate. The scheme shows that the Dullard government is not just incompetent, it is illegitimate. We did not vote to put Dullard into power. It was a hung parliament. We should be allowed to go back to the polls to vote again.